ISO / RTO · MODELED TAPE
PJMDEM98.4GWFCST104.2GW+5.8LMP$49.36CONG$11.6●RES15.8%●TX8●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026MISODEM76.5GWFCST84.9GW+8.4LMP$39.82CONG$18.7●RES17.4%●TX10●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026ERCOTDEM58.9GWFCST66.1GW+7.2LMP$41.20CONG$9.8●RES7.6%●TX12●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026SPPDEM31.7GWFCST36.2GW+4.5LMP$33.15CONG$6.4●RES21.6%●TX5●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026CAISODEM27.2GWFCST33.5GW+6.3LMP$63.20CONG$13.9●RES11.4%●TX7●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026NYISODEM16.1GWFCST19.0GW+2.9LMP$68.40CONG$10.3●RES14.1%●TX4●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026ISO-NEDEM12.8GWFCST15.4GW+2.6LMP$57.10CONG$7.9●RES17.2%●TX3●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026PJMDEM98.4GWFCST104.2GW+5.8LMP$49.36CONG$11.6●RES15.8%●TX8●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026MISODEM76.5GWFCST84.9GW+8.4LMP$39.82CONG$18.7●RES17.4%●TX10●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026ERCOTDEM58.9GWFCST66.1GW+7.2LMP$41.20CONG$9.8●RES7.6%●TX12●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026SPPDEM31.7GWFCST36.2GW+4.5LMP$33.15CONG$6.4●RES21.6%●TX5●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026CAISODEM27.2GWFCST33.5GW+6.3LMP$63.20CONG$13.9●RES11.4%●TX7●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026NYISODEM16.1GWFCST19.0GW+2.9LMP$68.40CONG$10.3●RES14.1%●TX4●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026ISO-NEDEM12.8GWFCST15.4GW+2.6LMP$57.10CONG$7.9●RES17.2%●TX3●MIXSrc: · · Upd Oct 10, 2026
SMStock & Milster
← Who We Advise

Economic Development Organizations

Know what your region can credibly offer large-load projects.

Economic development organizations are asked about power availability earlier and more precisely than ever. We research regional infrastructure readiness so organizations can represent it accurately.

Discuss Regional Readiness

Decisions they face

  • Which sites in the region to prioritize for readiness investment
  • How to describe power availability to prospective projects accurately
  • Where infrastructure gaps limit the region's competitiveness
  • Which utility and transmission plans affect future readiness

Questions our research addresses

  • Which sites have documented access to large-load capacity?
  • What transmission and substation projects would change regional readiness, and when?
  • How does the region compare with competing regions on infrastructure evidence?
  • What questions will large-load prospects ask, and what evidence answers them?

Research deliverables

Regional Infrastructure Readiness Review

Sites and corridors assessed against public infrastructure evidence.

Site Readiness Comparison

Priority sites compared using transparent criteria.

Infrastructure Gap Analysis

Constraints that limit competitiveness, with the plans that may address them.

Briefing for Leadership & Boards

Written findings suitable for board and stakeholder discussion.

Illustrative example — not a client engagement or live market data

Illustrative: preparing a region for large-load inquiries

Situation
A regional organization receives repeated inquiries from data-center and manufacturing prospects.
Research
Utility integrated resource plans, transmission plans and substation data are reviewed for five candidate sites.
Decision implication
The organization gains a sourced view of which sites can be represented as near-term ready and which depend on future upgrades.

Evaluating a decision like this?

Tell us the decision. A principal reviews every inquiry in confidence.